Archive for the ‘learning’ Category

ascilite09 conference reflections #3 – Day Two

Wednesday, December 9th, 2009

Tuesday already, and another nice morning in Auckland.

I set up my poster (Professional development and Web 2.0, can the space make a difference?) before heading into the theatre for Grainne Conole’s keynote, ‘Pushing the boundaries into the unknown, trajectories of user behaviour in new frontiers.’ The focus was on how new technologies create change in behaviour and asks how evolving practices might impact on education. Grainne also gave an overview of Cloudworks and reported on how the site was being used. Visit the Cloudworks cloud for James Clay’s live blogging of the presentation and links to the presentation (.ppt) & paper.

During the coffee breaks I talked with people about my poster and found that the project resonated with people with regard to it being a good model for professional development. The idea that longer term, project or research based activities are more beneficial and support deeper learning than those compared to one-off workshop type sessions.

The next session focus of virtual worlds and spaces where student interact online rather than face-to-face. A mix of presentations talking about experiences in Second Life, Elluminate and online discussions. The key to success seems to be the ability to not only make the learning authentic and having some connection to real world challenges, but also taking students along for the ride. Unless the students have a clear understanding of purpose and a relevance to them, their studies, future profession & aiming to solve real world problems, it is difficult to get them to fully engage.

After lunch I attended an interactive session called ‘Integrating Web 2.0 technologies into Moodle courses’. Stuart Mealor introduced us to a range of Web 2.0 social networking tools and asked us to consider if these tools might be included in the learning environment. He then demonstrated how some of these might be incorporated into Moodle fairly easily, and that it could be set up as an aggregator of a lot of social networking. Not sure of you’d actually want to incorporate all that much into the learning space though…

The afternoon session I went to was focused on design, and include papers on assessment, learning, patterns e-learning environment, and ‘edgeless’ universities. The two things that stood out for me were; a presentation explained the benefits of students priming and leading weekly discussion sessions, and that while they gained much from this, the peer e-learning critique by other students needed to be better scaffolded. Another presentation reminded us that online spaces need to be supported by the concept of community, so that students feel that they can ‘belong’ and have a connectedness with others that is social, educational and professional.

The conference dinner was held at the Sky Tower and it was a great night with heaps of good food & wine, lots of conversation & networking, and once the band started playing, lots of dancing.

ascilite09 conference reflections #2 – Day One

Tuesday, December 8th, 2009

It was a beautiful morning in Auckland and a pleasant stroll through the University of Auckland grounds to the impressive (fairly new) Owen G. Glenn Building.

A genuine and wonderful welcome and greeting in Maori to start off the conference.

The first keynote by Dr Scott Diener took us through the sense of self, sense of place, & sense of emotion that can be exploited by virtual worlds. He suggested that something different happens when we are together and finished off saying we need to be open and share our development and experiences.

Then a plenary by Mark Nichols who provocatively asked if we thought enough about, and recognised & questioned, the ‘group think’ (the wisdowm of crowds) that can mislead us regarding the imagined benefits of technology and elearning. We need to be realistic and not get caught up in the hype of possibility, but be rigorous in our examination and critique of the affordances of new technologies.

I sat in on a symposium called ‘Cascading Change: The role of social software and social media in educational intervention and transformation’. The discussion was focused on how little effect small interventions have at an institutional level and how might we best approach change from a broader ‘whole of organisation’ scope. What conditions, factors, drivers are required? I missed a social get together to continue the discussion so hope to hear more, in the meantime James Clay has blogged about the symposium.

In the afternoon I listened to presentations on the adoption of web 2.0 technologies. Take home points were; workshops don’t always work, follow-up and evaluate any professional development activity to see if practices have changed, there are always new tools to try, and students can do peer assessment if trusted & scaffolded appropriately.

The next session I attended was focused on mobile learning and we learnt about pod/vodcasts to support information literacy for students, using mobile technology to interact during the lecture and about lecturers adopting mobile technology into their teaching. Summary of these presentations is that while we can understand that there are benefits for learning in the adoption and use of mobile technologies, there are still significant barriers to uptake and we need to think carefully about how we might introduce and scaffold the use of these tools in learning & teaching.

Had some fun catching up with friends and meeting twitter followers/ees during the breaks. This link will search twitter for #ascilite09, the conference hashtag so that you can read all the tweets posted with delicious insights to the presentations and other goodies.

All the proceedings of the conference have been published and you can search the programme and find links to all the papers on line at the Conference Programme website.

ascilite09 conference reflections #1 – eportfolio workshops

Monday, December 7th, 2009

I’m hoping to establish a project next year to work on the implementation of eportfolios as a tool to support the development of student learning. I was able to attend the RMIT and University of South Australia – ePortfolio Review and Planning Forum a few days ago, and also a couple of workshops the day before the ascilite09 conference began.

All this has definitely given me a huge dose of eportfolio knowledge, understanding, projects, products, and an a good grasp of the scale & scope of implementing eportfolios as a tool for learning. I see that using these tools for learning may need some thinking around the curriculum and how that might need to be adjusted – particularly assessment activities. “An e-portfolio is a purposeful aggregation of digital items – ideas, evidence, reflections, feedback etc, which “presents” a selected audience with evidence of a person’s learning and/or ability.“ (Sutherland & Powell, 2007) .

My understanding of how we could use eportfolio comes from an acknowledgement that they can be a product, as well as a process. By product I would mean a collection of artefacts collected over time that may have been the result of assessment activities, resources, or digital objects meaningful to the learning that can provide evidence of learning or demonstrate competencies achieved. By process, I see the eportfolio as being something that records a learning journey, populated with reflection of what has been learned and how this learning has changed the perspectives & understanding of the learner.

I’m aware that when introducing eportfolios some issues will need to be addressed if implementation is to be successful. These may include the: the purpose & processes, if being used for assessment, motivation by staff & students, engagement by sponsors, ownership by all stakeholders, and acceptance that use could be disruptive to established practice. So, I see that much needs to be done to develop a project that could be used to trial or test the validity of eprotfolios into programs in the faculty. I’m looking forward to working with a team of interested & like minded people who will help me create the conditions, scaffolding, encouragement, rationale, and hopefully a community of practice, to support a project that aims to introduce eportfolios across a range of units across programs in the Faculty. My hope is that we can model how well eportfolios might provide conditions for learning that encourages student engagement and develops them as life long, reflective learners.

One thought I’ve had is that I may need to think about another name for eportfolio, as there seems to be a range of understanding of what eportfolio might mean so a different name that explains itself could be useful. The more I think about a name though, the more I realise I could confine the understood potential or purpose. I’ll keep thinking about this, and if you’ve got any ideas, I’d love to hear about them.

As I begin the next steps of my adventure with eportfolios, I would like to recognise the people who have been generous enough to share their stories about eportfolios and appreciate the insights that I’ve harvested from conversations with them. Lisa Gray, Megan Botterill, Gillian Hallam, Lisa Halstead, Jerry Leeson, Hazel Owen, Allison Miller, Helen Barrett, Shane Sutherland, & others. I also need to thank those people who have been willing to listen to me rant on about eportfolios as I came to develop my own understand of their value and benefit to learning.

There are a few good places to find resources regarding eportfolios; JISC – e-Portfolios: An overview, & the JISC – e-Portfolios: Key resources page, the Australian ePortfolio Project, and Dr. Helen Barrett’s Electronic Portfolios website.

Reference: Sutherland, S. and Powell, A. (2007), Cetis SIG mailing list discussions [www.jiscmail.ac.uk/archives/cetis-portfolio.html] 9 July 2007

automated captioning for Google Video & YouTube – great for accessibility

Friday, November 27th, 2009

Google Video and YouTube have recently announced new features that support automated captioning and automated timing for video that will help hearing impaired people.

This can only be a good thing, and indicates just how far new technologies have come to enable advanced speech recognition (ASR) to automatically generate captions for uploaded video. Well done! This is all still being rolled out to support languages other then English, but it’s only a matter of time for wider adoption of this development to support issues of accessibility for video content.

You can read more about this on the Google Blog post: Automatic captions in YouTube.

replacing the LMS/VLE and making the most of the opportunity?

Thursday, November 26th, 2009

The licence of our current Learning Management System (aka Virtual Learning Environment) runs out at the end of 2010 and we’ve been busy doing a review/evaluation for a new LMS/VLE. It’s been most opportune that there has been a lively debate (across the interwebs) regarding the VLE and whether or not it’s dead, and/or, long live the Personal Learning Environment (PLE). [Recently a new term has been suggested by Mary Bold: Learning Management Platform or LMP (link courtesy of Mark Smithers)]

A number of thoughtful blog posts have addressed the topic and this has led to a useful debate on the difference between the VLE and the PLE. I’ve listed a number of these post below and you might also be interested in viewing the video of the debate at the ALT-C ‘VLE is dead’ symposium.

  1. Steve Wheeler: Two fingered salute (a post that helped spark the debate)
  2. Donna Hay: Web 2.0 v VLEs (make sure you look for Part 2 as well)
  3. James Clay: It’s not dead… yet…
  4. Lindsay Jordan: The VLE/PLE debate
  5. Dan Stucke: The VLE debate, my thoughts
  6. Matt Lingard: VL-istically speaking

I’ve also just come across Mike Bogle’s recent post: Addressing the Big Picture, where he asks questions about the suitability of a LMS for learning. These (management)systems are good for many things but can fall down in providing opportunities & flexibility for learning.

All this is healthy discussion and useful for us all as we wrestle with what learning, teaching, and education might be/come in the future.

Part of our process involved setting a range of evaluation criteria, running some vendor session, having academics staff complete a number of scenarios in each product. All this has happened alongside other evaluations streams such as; total cost of ownership, technical such as technical and streams. It’s good to see that we are investing some resources in trying to do as thorough job as possible in a limited time frame.

One of the most interesting experiences of the process at our institution so far has been to spend most of a day with stakeholders from across the institutions (except for any students) and talking about how a new LMS would impact the core purpose of our work tat the university. What struck me most about all the talking we did, was that we didn’t talk about technology – we spoke about learning and how a new LMS might support that. We also talked about a parallel system that could include an e-portfolio and be the basis of a PLE.

I believe we need to be careful when talking about purpose – what we expect an system or environment to provide or support. Maybe we need to remember to choose the appropriate tool for the job, but that means we need to have a good toolkit. A tradesman will have invested in a range of good tools, fit for purpose & that cover the extent of his ‘discipline’ (although I do know a plumber who uses a hammer almost exclusively). This would mean that an investment needs to made in good tools and some ‘training’ in how to use them. Are our institutions willing to invest in more than just the tools?

My take-home of all this? Maybe it’s no so much about which product we choose (they all seem to have the same range of functionality), it’s more about our understanding of learning in a changing world, what flexible education is, and what the strategic direction the institution is with regard to the type of life-long learner we want our students to develop into. As I heard George Siemens ask in a webinar recently, ‘Is the university there for it’s ability to provide a transformative experience for learners, or does it exist for it’s ability to be a utilitarian agent for pathways into a profession?’ In making the decision to choose a new system are we also taking the opportunity to rigorously examine our position (policy & framework) on (flexible) learning?

slowing down enough to see what’s really going on…

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

I was prompted to think about slowing down by something someone said at the Learning technologies conference I attended last week. They suggested that we spend time doing nothing so that we might be able to nurture our creativity. An excellent idea!

But then someone tweeted about a video that shows that a drop of water actually bounces! Filmed at 2000 frames a second, the video allows us to see exactly what’s going on when a drop of water hits the surface of water in a container.

I was struck by this amazing process that we can’t see with the naked eye – it happens too fast. This led me to think about how fast we are moving in our world of technology and education. I’m not sure if I can articulate this well, but I’ll have a go…

We need to see/know what is really happening at that interface between student/teacher/technology. What are the things that can’t be seen by observing? How can we slow down enough so that these things become explicit? They may be things like cultural understanding, world views, passions, interests, philosophical positions, or motivations. It may also even be useful for our students to come to understand what’s happening at the nexus between learning & teaching. We could help them see how learning occurs and what it does to them. This means we need to watch carefully – we need to employ tools to help us see what is hidden to the naked eye. We need tools like surveys, research projects, focus groups, feedback & evaluations etc. Can you suggest any others?

It may be paradoxical, but it takes time to slow down to see & understand the things that happen inside the hearts & minds of others. Time that needs to be invested (along with resources for tools) for us to understand more fully & to help us make considered responses to what we ‘see’.